fbpx
Log in

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *
Captcha *

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR E-NEWSLETTER TODAY

For the latest Local News, Lifestyle News, Community Events, Property and more...

Please use a valid email address as we will send a confirmation email to this address.

Property

Algarve oil exploration suspended by parliament

oilrigtransportIn a major victory for the Algarve’s anti-oil lobby, the Portuguese parliament today voted for the “immediate suspension of the development of exploitation and extraction of oil and gas, conventional or unconventional, in the Algarve."

The Left Bloc proposal gained unexpected support from the Communist party and the ruling Socialist Party which until now had backed Prime Minister António Costa in promoting oil and gas exploration “so that the government knows what reserves are out there.”

The decision to suspend oil and gas exploration off the Alentejo coast was supported by the Socialists, Left Bloc, Communists, Greens and the Animal and Nature Party.

The proposal was voted against by the former ruling coalition parties, the Social Democrats and the Popular Party, under whose regime the concession contracts were signed in deep secrecy.

There were two key proposals debated. The first proposal, that was passed, was for the "immediate suspension of the development of exploration and oil and gas extraction, conventional or unconventional, in the Algarve.”

The second proposal failed. This was a more ambitious proposal which urged the government to "immediately suspend all contracts for the exploitation of hydrocarbons in the Algarve." The Socialists, Communists, and former coalition partners PSD and CDS-PP all voted against.

Parliament also approved other recommendations, proposed by the Socialists and the Communists, that the environmental impact of oil and gas exploration in the Algarve should be assessed from the outset, i.e. at the exploration stage.

Another approved recommendation, again proposed by the Socialists, was that there is a "proper publication of the findings of the evaluation of the concession contracts and as there are contracts where there are doubts about legality, the procedures for termination are adopted."

The natural resources directorate today has been instructed by the Minister of the Sea to conduct public information workshops on Portugal’s oil and gas exploration programme, the first of which will be in the anti-oil heartland of Aljezur on July 12th, at 18:30 at the Bombeiros building.

A second meeting is planned for Portimão on July 14th.

The Minister of the Sea considers it in the interests of all to extend the consultation period for the exploration of oil in the deep offshore in the Alentejo basin and has instructed the fuels authority to promote and organise public clarification sessions on the subject.

The date for exploratory drilling off Aljezur already had been moved from July 1st to August 3rd to leave space for public consultation after an ASMAA public petition forced parliament to debate the July 1st start of drilling by the Galp/ENI consortium.

The one public consultation that has been held in the Algarve was in Faro on January 12th this year at which representatives of oil companies gave brief propaganda presentations that assumed their audience was ill-informed and would remain so.

This certainly was not the case as Paulo Carmona, the president of the ENMC fuels authority, found out to his anger and embarrassment as he dodged many searching questions and threatened to abort the meeting if the audience of 400+ members of the public did not quieten down.

The public petition delivered to parliament by anti-oil association ASMAA last week, highlighted the lack of transparency in the whole oil concession programme with no public consultation sessions held in affected areas.

The Minister of Sea has instructed the government body, the Direcção Geral de Recursos Naturais, Segurança e Serviços Marítimos (DGRM) to conduct these information workshops, thus sidelining Paulo Carmona from the ENMC fuels authority whose handling of the Faro meeting lacked the professionalism required for those present to benefit from considered discussion.

The debate today included the suggestion that a task force be formed to assess and evaluate conformance or non-conformance by the oil companies, the Ministry of the Environment and the ENMC fuels authority. Such a group would include representatives of NGOs and universities.

What is certain is the drilling planned for today and postponed to August 3rd remains suspended, as does all oil exploration activity until the government has decided, in the light of public support for a clean energy, oil-free Algarve region, what it is going to do ‘in the public interest’ - a concept that until this point has been low on the list of political priorities.

António Costa’s original mission to find oil in Portugal was, he said, one of “national sovereignty and only once an inventory has been drawn up of what resources lie beneath the ocean should the discussion take place as to who might or might not explore for the country’s mineral wealth.”

With stiff and well-organised anti-oil opposition through ASMAA and other associations, and with Portugal’s desire expressed in Paris this year to reduce CO2 emissions, the battle for full and open public consultation has been won but the war continues.

Pin It

Comments  

+1 #6 dw 2016-07-04 13:13
Quoting Newby:
Managed correctly, oil and gas exploration can have minimal impact to the environment.


The impact of climate change is unlikely to be minimal.
+4 #5 Ed 2016-07-04 09:10
Quoting Newby:
As a life time worker in the oil industry, comments I read "against" are mostly emotional and not necessarily accurate. They are driven solely by the NIBY argument - not in my back yard. As an petroleum engineer, I have spent managed millions of dollars in drilling wells in an environmentally responsible way in all parts of the world. Managed correctly, oil and gas exploration can have minimal impact to the environment. I am not necessarily supporting drilling in the Algarve, but I would challenge those who are opposed to have accurate information. It seems we all use and need oil and gas daily in our lives, but we believe it is someone else's problem with respect to where it should be produced from. I can not comment on the government's management of the issue.

The problem is not Nimbyism for Nimbyism's sake, it is the questionable sense of having an oil industry next to a tourism industry, the lack of environmental impact assessments and worries over safety procedures, the overall secrecy of the concession agreements, the rip-off royalty deal agreed, and the Paris CO2 commitment. I am sure BP would argue that Deepwater Horizon was being 'managed correctly' until it all went horribly wrong. The Algarve accounts for 40% of Portugal's tourism income and people do not want that put at risk.
-2 #4 Newby 2016-07-04 08:57
As a life time worker in the oil industry, comments I read "against" are mostly emotional and not necessarily accurate. They are driven solely by the NIBY argument - not in my back yard. As an petroleum engineer, I have spent managed millions of dollars in drilling wells in an environmentally responsible way in all parts of the world. Managed correctly, oil and gas exploration can have minimal impact to the environment. I am not necessarily supporting drilling in the Algarve, but I would challenge those who are opposed to have accurate information. It seems we all use and need oil and gas daily in our lives, but we believe it is someone else's problem with respect to where it should be produced from. I can not comment on the government's management of the issue.
+6 #3 Poor Portugésa 2016-07-03 13:16
More thanks to our Ed and Paul's team for keeping this in the 'ex-pat' public eye and, no doubt, boosting our associations' perserverance.
My big doubt is: What is meant by 'suspended'?
Will it be reconstituted when the officials feel that 'the heat is off'?
+4 #2 Fboy 2016-07-03 12:08
This country will never progress and continue to flourish as long as the establishment continues to allow and, in some cases, condone the level of corruption that currently exists. No-one seems to take responsibility for contracts, the law and the implementation thereof where vast sums of monies are involved
+10 #1 liveaboard 2016-07-01 20:50
I wonder if anyone will "Clarify" how any of this can possibly be in the public interest, when the oil companies would only have to pay 10 cents a barrel for any oil they pump.
It's surely in someone's interest, but certainly not the public's.
What should be "clarified" is who exactly signed the deal, and whether they have any suddenly acquired hidden wealth.

You must be a registered user to make comments.
Please register here to post your comments.

Latest Features

In the Community

Classifieds

Home and Business Mobility
(Home and Leisure / Furniture)

Home and  Business Mobility

Steam Cleaner
(Home and Leisure / Miscellaneous)

Steam Cleaner

Seat Ibiza 1.2 Tdi Diesel
(Vehicles / Cars)

Seat Ibiza 1.2 Tdi Diesel

Bar for sale on the silver coast
(Property / For Sale)

Bar for sale on the silver coast