fbpx
Log in

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *
Captcha *

Coca-Cola to suspend €40 million Portuguese investment unless sugar tax is 'amended'

cocacolaThe Iberian division of Coca-Cola European has suspended a planned €40 million investment in its Setúbal plant unless the government scraps the proposed ‘sugar tax’ on soft drinks.

Andrés Curbelo, the head of Coca-Cola in Portugal is confident the tax that is included in the draft 2017 State Budget will be amended and talks of the ‘social impact’ if it is not.

The so-called "fat tax" on sugary drinks is set to penalise products considered harmful to health, such as cans of Coca-Cola each of which contains 35g of sugar in a 330ml can – the equivalent of 7 teaspoons of sugar.

The Pedro Passos Coelho administration was going to impose the tax in 2014 but eventually scrapped the plan.

The new tax will add between 8 cents and 16 cents per litre, has so annoyed the company that is has threatened to suspend its plans to expand the Refrige factory in Azeitão, Setúbal where the current 265,000m2 plant was going to be expanded by another 28,000 m2 in a €40 million investment over four years.

This production unit employs 450 people and the company claims the site also supports a further 4,500 indirect jobs.

Andrés Curbelo said the company has a 30% share in the Portuguese market for soft drinks and that it would be the company most affected by the tax, as inevitably the price of Coca-Cola to the consumer would have to rise.

At current production levels, the Treasury would benefit by around €80 million a year but nobody is able to predict the elasticity of demand and whether the market will bear the price rise without affecting production levels.

Curbelo agreed that it is "premature" to guess what impact the sugar tax will have on sales of Coca-Cola, but noted that the price of soft drinks in Portugal is very high compared with consumer purchasing power and concluded that the Portuguese consumer is very price sensitive.

This sort of corporate bullying is par for the course and in Coca-Cola's case, it in increasingly hard to justify selling drinks with such a high sugar content into a amrket woth increasing childhood obesity and type 2 diabetes.

Pin It

Comments  

-7 #7 Rene 2016-11-13 12:29
No harm in a can of coke now and then. Much prefer the real thing (Sugar) to all the other sweeteners etc which are worse for you. Moderation is the key, and that goes for giving it to kids as well. Mine only ever have coke when it is a special occasion.
-11 #6 liveaboard 2016-11-08 18:46
I enjoy the occasional coca-cola; and I think the sugar tax is an excellent idea.
If coke doesn't think their business will expand beyond it's current volume in this region; well, that's just win-win as far as I can see.
On those rare occasions when I treat myself to a sugar and caffeine blast, I'll pay the extra few cents.
-4 #5 graziano 2016-11-08 11:22
Quoting Chez:
Only good for cleaning silver.

Oh, not only: if one day you'll have to unscrew a rusted nut or screw and don't have any W40 at hand, just pour some of the miracoulous CocaCola on it, leave it for a quarter of an hour and... et voilá, this delicious :cry: drink will corrode the rust layer and you'll be able to unscrew the rusty part effortless - Great, isn't it? Imagine what it does in your stomach...
-5 #4 graziano 2016-11-08 11:12
Quoting PeterF:
Quoting Chip:
Boycott!

I don't know what any sane person would drink a can of Coca-Cola knowing it has the 7 teaspoons of sugar in it. These drinks companies should be banned for turning kids into sugar addicts. Bollocks to 'it's what the consumer wants' - where is the responsibility from the biggest soft drinks brand in the world? It has none.

Absolutely right!
-4 #3 PeterF 2016-11-08 10:00
Quoting Chip:
Boycott!

I don't know what any sane person would drink a can of Coca-Cola knowing it has the 7 teaspoons of sugar in it. These drinks companies should be banned for turning kids into sugar addicts. Bollocks to 'it's what the consumer wants' - where is the responsibility from the biggest soft drinks brand in the world? It has none.
-4 #2 Chez 2016-11-08 09:58
Only good for cleaning silver.
-2 #1 Chip 2016-11-08 09:38
Boycott!

You must be a registered user to make comments.
Please register here to post your comments.