fbpx
Log in

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *
Captcha *

Iraqis pay off Rúben Cavaco but immunity issue remains unresolved

8596 Portugal’s Prosecutor's Office is to pursue its investigation into the assault on Rúben Cavaco, the young man from Ponte de Sor so savagely beaten up by the Iraqi Ambassador’s twin sons last August.

The investigation will continue, despite an out-of-court agreement announced between the parties, a source in the Attorney General's Office has revealed.

"The Public Prosecutor's Office does not rule on out-of-court settlements. The investigation is underway, and the documentation received from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is under review," according to a statement sent on Friday.

The family of the young man considers that with the agreement "the case is closed".

Dina Fouto, a lawyer for one of the two Iraqi youths accused of assaulting the Portuguese lad, said the two parties reached "an out-of-court settlement" and that the family therefore has dropped its complaint." The compensation figure is said to be €40,000 or €65,000 depending on the source.

"The victim is considered to have been compensated from a moral and compensatory point of view," added Santana Maia Leonardo, Rúben Cavaco's lawyer, who did not reveal the amount paid under the agreement.

Contacted by Expresso, Santana-Maia Leonardo, lawyer of Reuben Cavaco, considers that, for the young man "the matter is closed."

The attack occurred on August 17, 2016, when 16-year-old Rúben Cavaco was beaten up in Ponte de Sor, Portalegre district, by the sons of Saad Mohammed Ali. He needed reconstructive surgery in Lisbon, so bad were his injuries.

The Iraqis had until Friday 13th, an extended deadline, to respond to Portugal’s request that diplomatic immunity be lifted from the twins to enable a full inquiry to be completed.

The compensation payment dies not halt this process and Portugal’s foreign affair minister now must decide his course of action.

 

See also: 'Iraqis dodge deadline in diplomatic immunity row'

 

Pin It

Comments  

0 #7 algarveandroid 2017-01-18 12:36
so between 40k and 65 k for a serious hiding?

What about the police costs and NHS bills?

Would suspect the victim is exactly that , twice , incluing once by his own , and the taxpayer that will be funding it.
0 #6 graziano 2017-01-17 10:07
Quoting dw:
The Iraqi regime is another US-installed middle east government, so is presumably a bunch of bloodthirsty psycopaths. In the US empire money talks.

Unfortunately not only there, my friend...
0 #5 graziano 2017-01-17 10:04
Quoting Peter Booker:
This outcome seems to show that if you are rich enough, you can assault anyone you like, and then pay for it. This method is similar to the old Saxon system of justice. But from the point of view of public safety and justice, it is hardly satisfactory.

Did you find it out only now? It has been always like that, it is called "human justice".
+2 #4 dw 2017-01-16 01:00
The Iraqi regime is another US-installed middle east government, so is presumably a bunch of bloodthirsty psycopaths. In the US empire money talks.
+2 #3 Ed 2017-01-15 14:03
Quoting Samuel Jones:
This kind of outcome is not ideal and abuses International norms of Diplomatic Immunity. It surely distinguishes developed from developing countries in the EU. Due to the emphasis made that the boy and the family have accepted the case is now closed, the assumption we must have is that ruffled feathers at the Prosecutors Office will now be smoothed by a 'donation' and for them too the case discreetly archived.
More advanced countries do not have this concept of paying off to fully settle a serious crime like GBH (if that is the UK equivalent). As far back as the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 it largely depends on intent.
A judge may make a Compensation Order in addition to a criminal sanction and / or fine which is paid to the UK Government. If the intent had been to cause serious harm, and the attack did, this could range, in theory, up to life. (Usually a maximum of 16 years)



Charges under consideration include 'attempted murder'.

Ed
+4 #2 Samuel Jones 2017-01-15 13:51
This kind of outcome is not ideal and abuses International norms of Diplomatic Immunity. It surely distinguishes developed from developing countries in the EU. Due to the emphasis made that the boy and the family have accepted the case is now closed, the assumption we must have is that ruffled feathers at the Prosecutors Office will now be smoothed by a 'donation' and for them too the case discreetly archived.
More advanced countries do not have this concept of paying off to fully settle a serious crime like GBH (if that is the UK equivalent). As far back as the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 it largely depends on intent.
A judge may make a Compensation Order in addition to a criminal sanction and / or fine which is paid to the UK Government. If the intent had been to cause serious harm, and the attack did, this could range, in theory, up to life. (Usually a maximum of 16 years)
+4 #1 Peter Booker 2017-01-14 22:28
This outcome seems to show that if you are rich enough, you can assault anyone you like, and then pay for it. This method is similar to the old Saxon system of justice. But from the point of view of public safety and justice, it is hardly satisfactory.

You must be a registered user to make comments.
Please register here to post your comments.