fbpx
Log in

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *
Captcha *

Sir Cliff Richard settles for 'substantial damages' with South Yorkshire police

CliffRichard2The 76-year-old singer Sir Cliff Richard decided to sue both the BBC and the South Yorkshire Police following reports that named him as a suspected sex offender.

Sir Cliff Richard has settled his dispute with the police, according to his lawyers and attention now will be focussed on seeing the BBC in court.

Sir Cliff’s lawyers have informed the court that South Yorkshire Police has agreed to pay ‘substantial damages’ in respect of tits ‘unlawful conduct’ and that the case therefore can be dropped.

BBC chiefs already have said they will “defend ourselves vigorously” while claiming that have a responsibility to report news stories that the deem to be in the public interest and the fact South Yorkshire Police has agreed to make a settlement does not alter the BBC’s stance.

Sir Cliff launched legal action over the coverage of a police raid on his property in Berkshire in August 2014 where the press had been tipped off and live video was broadcast.

Lawyers acting for the star say there has been a misuse of private information, infringement of human right in respect of private life and a breach of data protection legislation.

In 2013, a man made alleged to the Metropolitan Police that he had been sexually assaulted by Sir Cliff at Sheffield United football stadium in 1985.

Metropolitan Police officers passed the allegation to South Yorkshire Police in July 2014 who investigated. No charges were ever brought and the case formally was dropped in June last year.

Justin Rushbrooke QC said South Yorkshire Police should not have made disclosures to the BBC about the investigation into Sir Cliff and should not have colluded with the BBC in the way that they did.

A BBC spokeswoman said, in the wake of Sir Cliff’s settlement with police, that editors felt there had been a duty to report the investigation into the singer, “We’ve said throughout that the BBC’s responsibility is to report news stories that are in the public interest.”

“Against the extensive disclosure of historic child sexual abuse by figures of high public prominence, we consider that the report into the investigation into Sir Cliff for such an offence, and the decision by police to search his premises was such a news story and that the BBC had a duty to report it.”

The spokesperson added, “The police decision to settle the claim against them by Sir Cliff because of how they handled the investigation doesn’t change the fundamental principle that journalistic organisations should be able to report on the police and police investigations into individuals.

A search happened, and because it did, the BBC reported it – just as any other media organisation would have and did.”

Pin It

Comments  

+1 #4 Ed 2017-05-28 15:44
Quoting Margaridaana:
I hope his 'substantial damages' will be given to charitable causes. Why should such a wealthy man expect financial compensation? Why not accept a grovelling apology, if it is merited?

Had the police apologised in the first place, rather than waiting to be sued, I am sure he would have accepted that.

More interesting is the BBC's attitude which is risking substantial damages payable from licence payers' funds. Cliff is right to sue the BBC if he feels this is justified. There will be an uproar of the BBC loses on court and has to pay him.

It's so easy to be high principled when it's not you own money at risk.
+3 #3 Chip 2017-05-28 15:41
Edward Holmes is spot on.

I do hope Cliff is going to give his compensation to charity as it is the British taxpayer who is footing the bill (pardon the pun) not the police.

It is high time that the senior executives of public organisations and companies found guilty of wrongdoing started to pay these compensation claims from their own pockets, or face jail. It is unfair that misdemeanours by such people result in another stealth tax.
-1 #2 Margaridaana 2017-05-28 15:34
I hope his 'substantial damages' will be given to charitable causes. Why should such a wealthy man expect financial compensation? Why not accept a grovelling apology, if it is merited?
+4 #1 Edward Holmes 2017-05-27 22:08
The South Yorkshire Police won't be paying Sir Cliff Richard a penny,(although he deserves everything he gets from them), the British taxpayer will be footing the bill for the immoral, inept and outrageous behaviour of the management of this apology for a police force.

We are talking here about the same arrogant, incompetent police force that put out lies and blatantly false information about the victims of the Hillsborough disaster just to cover their own shortcomings and whose senior officers were described as "evasive" witnesses at the Taylor enquiry, it's beginning to look like arrogance and ineptitude are prerequisite for a senior police position in South Yorkshire.

Has anybody from South Yorkshire Police been fired or demoted over this debacle, knowing the way the establishment look after their own, retribution, if any, to the senior officers responsible will probably consist of early retirement on an index linked pension and a consultancy job with a contact in the Freemasons.

Makes you proud to be British. (NOT)

You must be a registered user to make comments.
Please register here to post your comments.