fbpx
Log in

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *
Captcha *

HMRC sharpens focus on offshore tax arrangements

hmrcThe UK Treasury has put forward proposals to impose stiff fines on offshore tax evaders.

The proposed new rules, announced on Wednesday, could fine evaders as much as 200% of the amounts of tax owed for any person or corporation who fail to declare before September 2018.

“For too long it has been too easy for people to hide their money overseas to evade tax. We are changing that,” said Jane Ellison, financial secretary to the Treasury.

Anyone owing UK tax will be fined somewhere between 100% and 200% of the undeclared tax. The fines are greater than the existing ones, which can be further reduced for those who have made careless errors rather than being deliberately deceitful.

HMRC may also be able look at tax statements going back as far as 20 years, if it is believed that tax evasion was deliberate.

Tax dodgers also run the risk of being named and shamed if they deliberately withhold information from HM Revenue & Customs.

The proposal is likely to be introduced as part of the government’s 2017 finance bill.

The Treasury said tax inspectors will soon acquire access to information on assets held offshore. Next year the “common reporting standard” begins. This agreement, which initially involves 54 countries later growing to 100, provides for the sharing of information on bank accounts of individuals, companies, trusts and foundations.

Included in this number are some traditional tax havens, such as the British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, the Isle of Man as well as Jersey and Guernsey.

By 2018, Switzerland, the Bahamas, Panama and Singapore will start sharing information.

Pin It

Comments  

+1 #6 Virjinie 2016-08-27 15:13
An 'extra' £3.6BN in dodged taxes?
Ye dogs and little fishes!
So HMCR goes for the soft targets - those less well-heeled and less able to defend their hard-earned, which, as Peter points out, is perceived as unfairly pursued, when the big wigs get away with keeping theirs'.
Sadly, not a problem for me personally..
+3 #5 dw 2016-08-26 00:17
This does nothing to address the perfectly legal tax dodges employed by the super rich, such as that of the Duke of Westminster. It is not a first step, but more likely the usual PR misdirection from HMG.
+4 #4 Charly 2016-08-25 19:31
Peter Booker, I fully agree with your statement. And we must not forget that England is the absolute top champion on behalf of creation + management of offshore companies. The thousands of specialised law offices in London + Gibraltar + Guernsey + Isle of Man + Jersey have several millions of offshore contracts in their portfolios. Simply ask David Cameron .....
The statement of the finance dept seems to be "rethoric" as at least 2 times a year we read the same story about offshore and the UK. Boaring at the end !
+4 #3 emBee 2016-08-25 17:41
:cry:
Agreed, both.
Re. Dukey, I read variously in his epitaphs that he was a really good fellow, a jolly decent chap who was so 'burdened by his wealth' that several timesduring his life he had considered unloading his burdensome wealth
Horrid misfortune that he didn't actually manage it over an exceptionally torturous and clearly uncomfortable life.
+5 #2 Peter Booker 2016-08-25 16:27
The real problem remains to be dealt with. We read that the estate of late Duke of Westminster should normally have paid an extra £3.6bn in inheritance tax on the £9bn that he has bequeathed. But his totally legal financial arrangements have avoided the liability. The Westminster estate derives much of its wealth from its ownership of a large chunk of Mayfair and Belgravia, and it is just not fair that he was able to set up avoidance arrangements of that order. And a tax system which is perceived as unfair will undoubtedly lend itself to being avoided and evaded.

Great Britain is notorious for being the money laundering capital of the world, and this step by HMRC is a least a first step towards putting GB´s house in order.
+6 #1 chip 2016-08-25 12:59
I would have thought they have enough material from Mossack Fonseca in Panama.
Presumably the Camerons have paid their dues???

You must be a registered user to make comments.
Please register here to post your comments.