fbpx
Log in

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *
Captcha *

National scrub clearance project - many land owners can not be identified

forrestOn Friday, June 1st, the GNR are empowered to impose fines on property owners who have not cleared their land of scrub – if the owners can be identified.

The president of the National Federation of Forest Owners' Associations agrees the work needs to be done to reduce the fire risk but, "much, much remains to be done," mostly on land where the owners live far away or where nobody knows who the owners are.”

Vasco Campos says that "we always return to the problem of the Land Registry where often we cannot even identify the owners," especially in the depopulated interiors of the North and Central regions.

The lack of ownership registration is an old problem that affects a large proportion of Portugal’s forested land and is one that successive governments have promised to solve but none have.

"Without knowing who the owners are, the situation is much more difficult. The problem of registration has to be reversed because it no longer makes sense in the C21st century that the State cannot identify owners of land," said Campos.

The National Landowners Association also believes that in many cases it will be difficult to find landowners because even the threat of fines is not much use, as the Tax Authority has outdated information.

The president of this association, Antonio Frias Marques, says that the inheritance and legal division of land is expensive for people and often is never done so the State has no way of finding current owners of land that needs cleaning which may be worth very little.

The president of the National Association of Forestry, Agriculture and the Environment (ANEFA) points out that there are two realities for the land clearing exercise this year: near urban areas and the coast, much scrub has been cleaned and great progress has been made; in the Interior where there are few people, there are many more difficulties.

Pedro Serra Ramos says that much remained to be done but he does not believe in fines because he is convinced that the authorities are mainly concerned with alerting and informing people.

Ramos says the Interior regions present a problem as the clearing up operation this year has been expensive and the financial return is low, so it is difficult to see how in the future there will be money to keep doing the work, year after year.

Owners had a deadline of March 15th to clear their land and clean up their forested areas, particularly near houses, but the Government changed the law so that fines could not be imposed until May 31st.

The GNR already has warned around 800 people and return to see if the cleaning has been done. If it has not, fines can be issued in the €280 to €10,000 range.

Pin It

Comments  

0 #3 Richard Atherton 2018-05-31 17:27
If land ownership is registered correctly there will be an annual property tax to pay. The end result of the cost of maintenance, taxes etc is that rural land can have a negative economic value. In this case there is zero incentive to register ownership. The state could change the law and take over abandoned land, but it would than have to pay for scrub clearance. No easy answers here.
+2 #2 livaboard 2018-05-31 13:45
As stated in the article, there is a basic economic problem with brush clearance; most of the land in question does not yield enough money to pay for its maintenance.
Much of this land is abandoned. If the owners can be traced and pressured, the result might be the exact opposite of the intent; the cheapest solution for the owner could be a match or lighter on a dark night.
If the land is ceded to the state, does the state even have the resources to perform this work? Remember it's not a one time job. It will need to be repeated every couple of years.
Even wealthy areas like California haven't done it.
Enforcement will require updating land records as well as building an electronic GPS database of roads, buildings, and plot borders. This is a costly project that most EU countries have already completed but Portugal has not.
+5 #1 Mike Williams 2018-05-31 08:27
The backwardness of Portugal's Public Administration is so often discussed in ADN. Each time the question raised "How could Brussels have hoped for Portugal to develop faster within the EU" with billions of development aid subsequently pilfered when it would have been so much more effective (and less expensive!) for the more developed EU to have treated countries like Portugal 30 years ago as the Balkans are being today. Have a period of measurable, embedded - no backsliding possible - progress. Across all parts of the Public Administration.
The Portuguese Land Registry is a classic example of retardedness. Much of it left over from the Salazar periods disappearances - often entire families evaporated. The adults never seen again and their offspring handed to Church orphanages as in Spain. The paperwork never updated as these were 'extra-judicial' activities. In a developed country unidentified land on this scale would be marked out and advertised online in a register. Then advertised globally. Provable landowners given say 3 to 5 years to officially claim it. The State then adopting it and either amalgamating it into National Parks or selling it on. Any late genuine claimants being compensated at a reduced rate for tardiness or offered similar value land.

You must be a registered user to make comments.
Please register here to post your comments.