fbpx
Log in

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *
Captcha *

Former PT directors and Deloitte sued over €897 million Rioforte loan

ptPharol, formerly Portuguese Telecom, today lodged a lawsuit against its own former auditors Deloitte which was involved in the disastrous PT investments in Rioforte, a property company within the Espírito Santo Group.

Pharol does not stop there though, as it also is suing former PT directors Henrique Granadeiro and Luís Pacheco de Melo for agreeing to lend Rioforte €897 million of PT’s cash, money that was never returned as Rioforte went under in the Grupo Espírito Santo meltdown.

Pharol informed the market regulator CMVM that it formally has lodged a petition at the Judicial Court of the District of Lisbon for damages against Deloitte due to the failed investments in Rioforte.

Deloitte, as PT’s former auditor, is accused of “violation of contractual duties due to the losses made on investments in debt instruments issued by companies within the Espírito Santo Group.”

This action against the auditor is for "compensation equal to the difference between €897 million and any amount Pharol might receive under the Rioforte insolvency proceedings, plus interest.”

Pharol’s current board is after the old guard as well as today’s statement says the company "blames other elected directors in the 2012/2014 period and third parties” who it sees as responsible for the financial damage resulting from investments in Rioforte and in other debt issued by members of the Espírito Santo Group (GES).

On October 2, 2015 Pharol announced that it was suing former PT directors Henrique Granadeiro, Luís Pacheco de Melo and Amílcar Pires over the affair.

Henrique Granadeiro and Luís Pacheco de Melo already had left the company, with Granadeiro's leaving speech notable as the most self-serving, arrogant and whining farewell in the history of the company.  

Amílcar Morais Pires, also being sued, was the chief financial officer of Banco Espirito Santo, and also was a board member of PT.

Pires was a BES placement on the PT board as the bank was PT’s largest single shareholder. He was therefore involved in PT lending money to Rioforte and clearly was uncertain as to the meaning of the phrase “conflict of interests.”

PT's former Chief Executive, Zeinal Bava, has not escaped and also is cited in the court submission for actions leading to what are described as illegitimate loans to GES companies and for failing to fulfilling what was expected to comply with internal audit procedures which he controlled directly.

Pharol says that Bava "never ensured that such internal control systems were in place that would prevent investments that violated the statutes, regulations and policies of the company."

The court submission adds that "it is well understood that he did not, nor intend to reveal, financial reporting documents of such investments that he well knew were unlawful."

Bava moved from PT to telecoms company 'Oi' in Brazil until rather generously paid off of €5.4 million paid monthly €5.4 million plus a three year ban from working in telecoms.

Bava will get 36 monthly installments of €150,000 but has made an estimated €50 million while overseeing PT's collapse in shareholder value. Post-Bava, Pharol managed to lose an additional 68% in value in 2015 as the repercussions of the Rioforte loan continue to affect the company. 

 

Pin It

Comments  

0 #3 MarkW 2016-01-10 14:09
Interesting strategy, if the investment had worked then we would have heard nothing from Pharol as they languished in massive profits. Oh why does Pharol not invest in their infrastructure? NOS amongst others are collecting thousands of new subscribers to their excellent fibre internet service, while Pharol with MEO rob you every month by supplying a sub standard service via the very old copper wire infrastructure that never delivers speed they contract. Try and cancel your MEO subscription, hahahaha! unless you go to the main MEO office in Faro, are obliged to speak by telephone, while being attend to by their staff (who don't have the power to accept your reminding you contract) with someone who asks "why do you want to cancel your contract" - obvious reply -"because its shi*", then they offer you much cheaper deals, anything to keep you. Finally when you refuse all of them, they agree that in one month they will cancel the contract - don't forget to give back you modem phone or they will continue to charge you rental etc RIP OFF PHAROL - glad they lost a packet, they deserve to!
+4 #2 Anne T 2016-01-08 10:43
The shit that all the big 6 auditing firms get up to is scary. They act as consultants and auditors at the same time. Talk about conflict of interest and then off course comes the Teflon auditing responsibilities. How anyone can consult and then audit what your consultants have recommended and "fail it" is beyond my simple understanding.

So not surprised at this news item ... what is surprising is that at long last someone is questioning and taking action ...
0 #1 Peter Booker 2016-01-08 09:06
The rules of auditing ensure that the auditors are covered in Teflon. This is how they can audit the same company for years, and also sell into that company their own financial products.

Deloitte is guilty of crass incompetence, and my prediction is that they will get away scot free.

You must be a registered user to make comments.
Please register here to post your comments.