fbpx
Log in

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *
Captcha *

Summers and Swan reply to critics of their Madeleine book (Part I)

madeleine9The best-selling authors Anthony Summers and Robbyn Swan have responded to criticisms that their new book Looking for Madeleine, published on September 11, 2014 amounts to a pro-McCann ‘whitewash’ rather than the first in-depth, independent and objective analysis of the disappearance and search for the little girl.

The criticisms come from people who do not accept the theory that Madeleine McCann was abducted.

In their first interview with the media in Portugal, the authors told me they had in the past tackled controversial subjects, “but never have we encountered this degree of intense reaction to a book even before it has been published. It underlines, we think, why authors who do our kind of intensive investigative work needed to tackle this story.”

How, I asked, did they decide on this subject in the first place?

“In May 2012, readers may recall, the UK’s Scotland Yard released an age progression image of Madeleine as she might have looked if still alive. Robbyn was watching the news with our own young daughter, who is a little older than Madeleine McCann, and whose middle name happens also to be Madeleine.

“Her interest was piqued by hearing her own name, and she asked: ‘What really happened to that little girl? Do her parents really believe she is still alive?’

“And – this really got us: ‘How long would you look for me, Mummy?’

Robbyn realised she didn’t have good answers, and we started tentatively digging. We starting a first scan of the massive police dossier, read Kate McCann’s published account - and took on board the voluminous criticism and analysis of the case, and of the McCanns themselves, that was available online.

“We soon realised as we talked to people from all walks of life that many, many people seemed to suspect there was something wrong with the parents’ account and – and we started to think we could bring something to this almost unique story by drilling down to the best evidence. Our publisher agreed. That’s how it started, and here we are more than two years later.”

The authors are adamant they have not been influenced at any stage or in any way by the McCann family or anyone close to the investigation.

“As you will see in the Notes section of Looking for Madeleine, we felt at the outset that it was only right to advise Madeleine’s parents and London’s Metropolitan police that we planned to investigate with a view to a book.

“We had a single meeting with the McCanns and one with the Met – both of them early in our research. The parents, and then the police, made only one request of us – a fair one given the parents’ hope and the Met’s working thesis that Madeleine may still be alive – that we do nothing that might hinder or interfere with the ongoing investigation. We have been careful to abide by that request.”

How much cooperation did they get from Kate and Gerry McCann during their research and writing?

“We have been totally independent of the McCanns – and we emphasise this, given the torrent of internet innuendo to the contrary even before Looking for Madeleine was published.

“An initial meeting aside, a meeting at which Madeleine’s parents made no attempt at all to influence our thinking, there was no cooperation. The parents believed we should work independently of them, and we would not have wanted it otherwise.”

Since the couple began working on the book, both the Portuguese Polícia Judiciária and the Metropolitan Police Service have moved from ‘reviewing’ to renewed investigation and so they have had no more information from either force than was “ethically correct.”

However, they said they have had contacts with former senior law enforcement officers in both countries and these have served as a valuable guide to the early investigation, and to some degree to what has been going on more recently.

The authors said that before they started their research they had no opinion on whether Madeleine had been abducted or not. And after two years of non-stop work, they have an opinion but not a definitive one.

“We were open - and still are - to anywhere the evidence might lead us. When Madeleine vanished we were deep into the research for our previous book, on the September 11 attacks. That also involved reading many tens of thousands of documents, travel, etc. So, like millions of others, we only had the blurred impression gained from the welter of media coverage and the torrent of rumour. It is only now after looking at every angle that we can justify expressing an opinion. We do that in Looking for Madeleine.”

Anthony Summers and his wife Robbyn Swan think the most likely scenario is that Madeleine was indeed abducted. There is a “cogent skein of evidence” pointing to the notion that she was a carefully selected target, very possibly of a paedophile.”

Does the book contain any real revelations? In other words have Summers and Swan uncovered any previously unknown facts that bring us closer to understanding what really happened to Madeleine?

“Looking for Madeleine is shot through with new information and analysis. In particular, we obtained information not seen publicly before that throws vivid new light on the activity and modus operandi of the intruder who perpetrated at least one of the child sex attacks in the period preceding Madeleine’s disappearance.

“As important, we obtained detailed information on an incident in Praia da Luz that may suggest one of the phoney “charity collectors” may have had a sexual motive.

This episode, in particular, coupled with analysis of the overall jigsaw of testimony, contributes to a new understanding of a possible abduction scenario.

“Another key element is the first ever in-depth interview with Brian Kennedy, the wealthy benefactor who throws light on the McCann’s private investigation effort. And much, much more.”

As to the serious doubts about independence and objectivity expressed before the book’s publication, especially by critics who totally reject the abduction theory, the authors responded: “The notion of criticising authors about a book even before it has been published may speak volumes about the biases of those levelling the criticisms.”

© Len Port 2014

* Anthony Summers, formally a deputy editor of the BBC's Panorama, is the author of eight investigative books and the only two-time winner of the Crime Writers' Association's top award for non-fiction. Robbyn Swan, his co-author and wife, has partnered Summers on three previous biographies and investigations. Their book The Eleventh Day, on the 9/11 attacks, was a Finalist for the 2012 Pulitzer Prize.

sumersandswan

 

_______

For Part II of this interview, see:

http://www.algarvedailynews.com/news/3410-summers-and-swan-interview-part-ii

_______

Algarve-based, Len Port, has been a journalist for 50 years, working as a staff reporter, broadcaster and freelance correspondent for many leading news organisations. He covered events in the Far east in the Sixties, and in Northern Ireland and South Africa in the Seventies.

Since moving to Portugal in the early Eighties, he has edited regional magazines, contributed to national dailies in Britain and written several books, two of which are currently available as ebooks with Amazon.

Popular posts on Portugal Newswatch

 

Pin It

Comments  

+1 #5 freskas 2016-05-12 16:31
seeing the files from the portuguese policia judiciaria its easy to see that theyve followed every lead and done a great work and found evidences that it has been an accident that may have caused the death of maddie and the parents were envolved in covering it up yeah nobodys perfect and maybe they have done mistakes along the way but after so much time and money the met and scotland yard are not closer from cracking the case.Maybe they're looking in the wrong place...

'BLINDNESS IS A STATE OF MIND'
+1 #4 Enid 2014-09-13 15:39
Surely the issue is whether Portugal has an effective Police and Justice system for the EU in the 21st century - as they agreed to provide when joining. Without one in Portugal - the EU is so much weaker.

4/5 of Portuguese want no part of their Police and Justice system. And how can you explain 'Crimewatch' here ?

But then the Portuguese have a long history of 'agreeing' to do or not do something. Being trusted to follow through .... then they do either nothing or even the opposite!

Here are just two more examples ....

The 1386 Treaty of Windsor was assumed by us British to be an 'alliance'. Wrong! So Portugal attacks Britain in 1588 !

Portugal signed a variety of agreements to abolish slavery everywhere it controlled through the 1800's. Yet still practiced it !

The British giving it as a justification for our 1890 Ultimatum. That with us the native African would be guaranteed to be free - not a slave.
:sad:
0 #3 Daphers 2014-09-13 10:46
When will more Portuguese be honest enough to admit that it is warped patriotism that supports their policing system? One that very few Portuguese have anything voluntarily to do with.

There has been constant reference by the more open' Portuguese in their own press to the effect that very little has changed in the Portuguese Policing and Justice system since 1974. That it was failing before then ... as it continues to fail now.

The core part of this case has always been that there were several, or more, people nearby that apartment complex at the time who had criminal intent.

Those who had already burgled rooms there with a master pass key or, a sweaty swarthy 'attempting' to molest young white girls as already reported to the Police. But unknown to the McCanns or any other guest !

So - why still this weird secrecy ? How does it help find someone 'at risk to themselves' or the opposite - 'a risk to society' ...
+3 #2 chez 2014-09-13 08:21
Quoting Mike Towl:
Who did it then?

Aliens ?
+2 #1 Mike Towl 2014-09-13 07:39
Who did it then?

You must be a registered user to make comments.
Please register here to post your comments.