fbpx
Log in

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *
Captcha *

Algarve Mayors push through regional 'Tourist Tax'

farocamaraThe self-serving greed of the Algarve’s Council mayors has found expression in today’s vote to introduce a per night tourist tax on visitors to the region, just at a time when competing destinations are regaining strength in the market.

A tourist tax of €1.50 per night will be extracted between March and October with mayors’ group AMAL estimating that this will generate revenues of €20 million per year which they claim will be spent on local projects.

AMAL’s chairman, Jorge Botelho, said the tax will not impact demand, a view at odds with the region’s hoteliers who will be charged with hiking booking process, collecting the revenue and dealing with complaints.

Botelho’s justification is deliberately naive, "The introduction of the tourist tax is intended in some way to make the tourist pay part of the costs that the municipalities bear during their stay," despite his intention to spend the tax on 'community projects.'

The €1.50 per head per night tax will be payable only during the first seven days of a holiday by anyone over 12-years-old.

The one sane voice in the room, the Silves mayor, Rosa Palma, considered the measure to be a "hoax" that creates inequality and will be counterproductive. Faro’s Bacalhau wanted to go for €2 per night and make the tax an all-year-round affair.

The tourist tax now has to be voted on by each Council Assembly with Vila Real de Santo António already committed to levying the tax as part of its desperate effort to get out of crippling debt after years of mismanagement, not with a view to spend the money on a vague catch-all programme of ‘community projects.’

Hotels will charge the fee and collect the money, passing it on to AMAL and their local Councils.

AMAL mentioned wonderful projects such as the Ecovia and the Via Algarviana, which cross several municipalities, failing to note that they are meant to be paying for these anyway.

The nonsense continued with justifications embracing culture, fixing up heritage rehabilitation buildings and paying for 'promotion activities.'

Alojamento Local properties will be taxed with the illegal rentals market delighted that yet another reason has been given for tourists to ‘go private’.

AMAL wants the tax to start next March but it is unlikely that all councils will be in a position to do so, thus creating more inequality between the Algarve’s council areas.

The record of Councils spending money on intended purposes is poor. Devious accounting, the diversion of funds from one area to another and the announcement of projects that never get built, or fail to be maintained, are all too common. This tourist tax is poorly thought through, greedy, opportunistic and ultimately just another on-cost for hotels to carry in the headline prices, putting the region at a disadvantage compared to competing destinations.

Pin It

Comments  

+1 #12 fund better rail 2018-10-24 11:22
It's a pity the money raised could not be used in conjunction with the national government to improve the rail line in the Algarve to a metro style covering from Faro airport to Faro then once built for each region of the Algarve to add a new live to cover the area.
+3 #11 PeterD 2018-09-24 07:13
Quoting Peter Booker:
Ed, it seems that many of your correspondents, perhaps even yourself, are keen to see more and more tourists here in the Algarve.
Extra people means more crowds in restaurants and beaches, not to mention town centres and shops. More profit to hotel owners? Greater turnover in tourist businesses? Where is the benefit to the resident of the Algarve?

In mid September, like many others, I breathe a sigh of relief as the traffic subsides and I can make my way in peace.


Peter, I hope that you will not object to paying additional tax to compensate for the loss of tax from tourists and the business they support in order to pay for local services. I presume that you would rather pay more tax than reduce public services. I am also against the tourist tax because it is a lot of money for many less well off families.
+2 #10 JanetL 2018-09-22 20:35
Quoting Chip:
Councils get all the cost and hassle of tourism yet the main income is VAT which goes to central goverment.
It shouldn't be just the hotels who make a killing whilst residents pay the bills.


Councils get large amounts of IMI from hotels. if local services are not able to cope with tourist numbers, charge the hotels more IMI. Councils also get a cut of property transfer taxes and the boom in tourism is accompanied by a boom in property purchases. They do not need €20 million extra per year and I doubt will send it wisely, its like giving an alcoholic the key to the wine cupboard.
+3 #9 Chip 2018-09-22 20:22
Councils get all the cost and hassle of tourism yet the main income is VAT which goes to central goverment.
It shouldn't be just the hotels who make a killing whilst residents pay the bills.
-3 #8 Peter Booker 2018-09-22 19:30
Ed, it seems that many of your correspondents, perhaps even yourself, are keen to see more and more tourists here in the Algarve.

Extra people means more crowds in restaurants and beaches, not to mention town centres and shops. More profit to hotel owners? Greater turnover in tourist businesses? Where is the benefit to the resident of the Algarve?

In mid September, like many others, I breathe a sigh of relief as the traffic subsides and I can make my way in peace.
-1 #7 Richard 2 2018-09-22 18:31
In most locations around the world, the "tourist tax" is year round and not limited to the first seven days. People who would choose other holiday destinations to save the tourist tax are not likely to be those who would meaningfully contribute to the local economy (other than their contributions to rubbish, sewage, overcrowding, etc.)
+2 #6 robert1 2018-09-22 10:07
Quoting Peter Booker:
I agree with Albert. Will an extra €10 for a holiday really deter the average tourist? I detect the real aim, which is to discourage the price-sensitive lower end of the market. Many of your correspondents on this site, Ed, have expressed a desire to uprate the type of tourist coming to the Algarve. And this type of approach could do just that.

As for the ill-defined objectives for spending the tax money collected, there are many areas of Câmara responsibility which come under increased pressure with the enormous number of summer tourists attracted to the Algarve.

As a long-term resident, I welcome the potential control over the number of summer tourists and increased municipal tax receipts, and I think this new tax is a good move.
For a family of 4 (a adults with 2 teenagers) this adds Euro 42. There are other locations to choose from where they can allocate this money to holiday activities other than just tax.
+2 #5 Ed 2018-09-22 09:59
Quoting Peter Booker:
I agree with Albert. Will an extra €10 for a holiday really deter the average tourist? I detect the real aim, which is to discourage the price-sensitive lower end of the market. Many of your correspondents on this site, Ed, have expressed a desire to uprate the type of tourist coming to the Algarve. And this type of approach could do just that.

As for the ill-defined objectives for spending the tax money collected, there are many areas of Câmara responsibility which come under increased pressure with the enormous number of summer tourists attracted to the Algarve.

As a long-term resident, I welcome the potential control over the number of summer tourists and increased municipal tax receipts, and I think this new tax is a good move.

Many of the region's hotels rely on the cheaper end of the market. An extra €50 tax on top of the hotel price - VAT and increasingly sporty air travel costs will deter cost-conscious holidaymakers who now must save extra the money to have their annual break.
-1 #4 Ed 2018-09-22 09:53
Quoting Peter Booker:
I agree with Albert. Will an extra €10 for a holiday really deter the average tourist? I detect the real aim, which is to discourage the price-sensitive lower end of the market. Many of your correspondents on this site, Ed, have expressed a desire to uprate the type of tourist coming to the Algarve. And this type of approach could do just that.

As for the ill-defined objectives for spending the tax money collected, there are many areas of Câmara responsibility which come under increased pressure with the enormous number of summer tourists attracted to the Algarve.

As a long-term resident, I welcome the potential control over the number of summer tourists and increased municipal tax receipts, and I think this new tax is a good move.
Here's one: #1 Stefan Drew 2018-09-22 06:31
"This morning we are booking a holiday. Lots of potential destinations to go to. And seeing how we will be taxed in the algarve we are going to Madeira instead."
-1 #3 Peter Booker 2018-09-22 09:24
I agree with Albert. Will an extra €10 for a holiday really deter the average tourist? I detect the real aim, which is to discourage the price-sensitive lower end of the market. Many of your correspondents on this site, Ed, have expressed a desire to uprate the type of tourist coming to the Algarve. And this type of approach could do just that.

As for the ill-defined objectives for spending the tax money collected, there are many areas of Câmara responsibility which come under increased pressure with the enormous number of summer tourists attracted to the Algarve.

As a long-term resident, I welcome the potential control over the number of summer tourists and increased municipal tax receipts, and I think this new tax is a good move.

You must be a registered user to make comments.
Please register here to post your comments.