fbpx
Log in

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *
Captcha *

Deal signed for Montijo airport despite no environmental study

egretThe agreement to start work at the Montijo air base today was signed between Portugal’s airports concession holder and the Government.

The Montijo conversion should be completed by the end of 2022 but the contract covers work to 2028. The €1.15 billion cost will be borne by Aeroportos de Portugal (ANA), controlled by the French infrastructure group Vinci.

The financing agreement and changes to the current infrastructure at Lisbon’s Humberto Delgado airport was signed despite the absence of an environmental impact study covering the new airport’s effects on local bird life in the Tagus Estuary Nature Reserve.

During the first year of operation, seven million passengers are expected to use Montijo, reducing the pressure on Lisbon airport which reached capacity in the summer of 2017.

Today’s ceremony was attended by Prime Minister, António Costa, the Minister of Planning and Infrastructure, Pedro Marques, the head of Vinci, Xavier Huillard, and the president of Vinci Airports, Nicolas Notebaert.

The agreement does not please the ‘Plataforma Cívica Aeroporto BA6 Não’ pressure group that has been against Montijo airport’s conversion, not does it sit well with the environmental organisation, Zero, which is formulating a complaint to Brussels.

The binding agreement between ANA and the state initially was scheduled to be signed off last October, according to the memorandum of understanding, which indicated the end of 2018 for ANA to deliver a second, more professional, environmental impact study to the Portuguese Environmental Agency.

The Green Party has scheduled a debate in parliament on Thursday to discuss the government's decision to sign the deal without the environmental study.

Left Bloc leader, Catarina Martins, expressed "enormous perplexity" at the fact that the agreement was to be signed for the new airport without the necessary environmental impact study.

The Secretary General of Portugal Communist Party, Jerónimo de Sousa, accused the Government of pandering to big business and avoiding its environmental responsibilities.

The pro-Montijo Social Democrat Party said it will call the Minister of Defence and the head of the Portuguese Air Force to parliament to provide clarification and have spoken of, "three lost years" – the period of delay for the completion of a competent environmental study – suggesting that the only reason the deal was rushed through today was the impending autumn general election.

"We are facing three lost years, what we have on the table today as a solution is no different from what we had in 2015," said PSD deputy chairman, Emídio Guerreiro who also asked for an explanation of the consequences of a possible negative environmental impact study and how this would affect today’s contract.
Prime Minister, António Costa said yesterday that the decision to expand Lisbon airport’s capacity, by converting Montijo, is a decision that is 50 years late.

"Even after this agreement, the debate will continue, but the decision is this and it must be put into practice," said António Costa at the signing ceremony, leaving no doubt in the minds of environmentalists that whatever the consequences to local wildlife and passenger safety, the airport will be built.

The PM said that work can start at Lisbon Airport while the government waits for the environmental impact study that concerns only Montijo,

"It is clear that we are subject to something that no one can call into question, which is the environmental impact and the guarantee of aviation safety. Once this assumption is verified, the work has to move forward and that is why it can advance already in the place where it can advance, Humberto Delgado Airport, as there we are not subject to any environmental impact study and therefore the work there can start now," explained the prime minister.

Pin It

Comments  

-1 #8 Darcy 2019-01-09 17:14
Ed,
Why would the military or any other group hide bird strikes from the Government or the public, come on now, what is there to be gained.
As I've said, Harrison sounds like he believes in conspiracy theories.
0 #7 Ed 2019-01-09 09:24
Quoting Roy Carpenter:
If there was no environmental damage or problem with bird strikes for military aircraft it would seem unlikely that civil aircraft (apart from increased frequency) would be a problem. So why delay for an environmental study when it is needed urgently ? What is needed is a rapid transit system between the two airports.
The first study commissioned by ANA was so flawed and obviously biased that even the Environment Ministry was appalled and demanded a proper one be done. This second one is promised for the first quarter this year and will be scrutinised by Zero et al and 'all measure contained therein, adopted by the concession holder' (my arse). I wouldn't like to be the report's author.

These environmental reports used to be box-ticking exercises but, as we have seen at Salgados-Praia Grande, the Courts (at least) can take them seriously.
0 #6 Ed 2019-01-09 08:54
Quoting Darcy:
[quote name="Harrison"] (How do we know there was no damage from military bird strikes - is it not more likely that the military just do not report these happenings.)
Harrison,
You probably believe that aliens exist too ...

Perfectly reasonable question from Harrison about bird strikes on military aircraft, I thought...
-1 #5 Peter Booker 2019-01-09 08:48
You reported, Ed, that the head of TAP says already that Montijo is too small, and does not answer the question.
0 #4 Phil Austin 2019-01-08 23:34
Developing Monteijo may reduce flight traffic into Delgado but what about the extra ground traffic crossing the Vasco da Gama bridge into the Lisbon road network?

I've suggested before that a new river crossing will become necessary for this. Whether this is a new road bridge or perhaps a fast ferry crossing (large hovercraft?) crossing directly from the airport I don't know.

Maybe this is here an 'environmental impact study' could be useful.

Then again there is always the ready functional Beja airport with the same provisos.
-1 #3 Darcy 2019-01-08 23:19
[quote name="Harrison"] (How do we know there was no damage from military bird strikes - is it not more likely that the military just do not report these happenings.)
Harrison,
You probably believe that aliens exist too ...
-1 #2 Harrison 2019-01-08 20:18
How do we know there was no damage from military bird strikes - is it not more likely that the military just do not report these happening ? Getting GNR policing statistics is like hens teeth unlike their civilian counterparts.
Also the summons to parliament of the military is just hot air as we know from the Tancos Arms theft which saw no military attend that enquiry to give explanations to the politicians.
+2 #1 Roy Carpenter 2019-01-08 19:02
If there was no environmental damage or problem with bird strikes for military aircraft it would seem unlikely that civil aircraft (apart from increased frequency) would be a problem. So why delay for an environmental study when it is needed urgently ? What is needed is a rapid transit system between the two airports.

You must be a registered user to make comments.
Please register here to post your comments.