Flight rules remain the same - land border remains closed

Dr Photo - FLIGHT RULES REMAIN THE SAME - LAND BORDER REMAINS CLOSEDThe rules for air circulation remain the same in the next phase of the deconfinement plan that starts on Monday, and the land border with Spain remains closed for the next 15 days, the prime minister announced yesterday.

“Regarding flights, the rule is the rule that is in force, therefore, in the majority of origin countries that have less than 500 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, they can come as long as they have a test. Other than that, they can come and subject themselves to testing, plus quarantine”, affirmed António Costa, in the press conference that followed the meeting of the Council of Ministers, who were assessing the situation of the pandemic in Portugal, in order to assess the conditions to evolve to the next stage of the deconfinement process.

The minister gave the example of passengers from the United Kingdom, who continue to be able to enter Portugal with the proof of a negative test for SARS-COV-2, with no need to be quarantined.

Regarding the land border with Spain, António Costa said that, despite the positive evolution of the pandemic in both countries, it remains closed for the next 15 days.

The third stage of the deconfinement plan, which starts on Monday, applies to most of the country, except in seven counties (Alandroal, Albufeira , Beja, Carregal do Sal, Figueira da Foz, Marinha Grande and Penela), which will keep with the rules currently in force, and four (Moura, Odemira, Portimão and Rio Maior), which will retreat to the 'tighter' rules of the first phase of deflation.

On May 3rd, the last phase of this deconfinement is planned, however, this is dependent on the evolution of contagions and the number of new cases of Covid-19.

Original article available in Portuguese at http://postal.pt/

 

Pin It

Comments  

-5 #21 Steve 2021-04-21 16:34
Quoting Reg:
Steve
So you are happy to advise your friends and family to take a concoction of Hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, Bromhexine all of which are unlicensed for the use of Covid instead of having the vaccine?
I am glad people are not taking your advice.
Reg are you happy to carry one posting your misguided assumptions about me?
Unlike you I do like to answer reasonable questions.
No I do not give health advice to any of my friends or family (apart from imediate family) or you or anyone here. Everyone is adult enough to make their own health decisions. I will however point out to alternative scientific information that contradicts the official narrative, information you and others here embrace without challenging.
For your information the drugs you mentioned to treat Covid are only unlicensed in some countries. Slovakia is one example where Ivermectin has officially been approved for the treatment of Covid. These experimental vaccines have not been licensed in any country.
-2 #20 Reg 2021-04-21 14:57
Steve
So you are happy to advise your friends and family to take a concoction of Hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, Bromhexine all of which are unlicensed for the use of Covid instead of having the vaccine?
I am glad people are not taking your advice.
-5 #19 Steve 2021-04-20 17:39
Quoting Reg:
Another Steve in the making.he will rather die than admit he is wrong.

https://youtu.be/nQ-IRZUJhzQ


And what is it that you think I am wrong about Reg? Is it what I said about these "vaccines" being experiemental and unlicensed, never tried on humans before? Or Ivermectin being used as an effective treatment for Covid-19?

Summary of the Clinical Trials Evidence
for Ivermectin in COVID-19
https://b3d2650e-e929-4448-a527-4eeb59304c7f.filesusr.com/ugd/593c4f_cb262b08142747c99f40929fb617652e.pdf
-2 #18 Reg 2021-04-20 12:50
Another Steve in the making.he will rather die than admit he is wrong.

https://youtu.be/nQ-IRZUJhzQ
+1 #17 Stuart Wood 2021-04-20 11:37
I think Steve is Mr. Ed... https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19
-3 #16 Steve 2021-04-20 09:58
Quoting Reg:
Steve
So you happily endorse swprs.org which recommends using Ivermectin (a deworming tablet) as a Covid prophylaxis? A drug that is not authorised by the EMA (see my post #6)!!
Either Ivermectin works and saves lives or it doesn't. So far 52 trials have said it is effective not only as a prophylaxis but also as an early treatment.

Quoting Reg:

I wonder if you have agreed to have the vaccine which is approved by the European Medicines Agency.
The same EMA that authorised an experimental treatment halted in several European countries due to it's severe side effects? There is no need for a vaccine when the risk of death or severe illness is almos zero for the majority of us. Especially when there are other proven effective treatments available. These so called "vaccines" are experimental and have yet to be licensed. I'm happy to stay in the control group of this experiment.
+4 #15 Norman L 2021-04-19 15:12
Quoting Steve:
Quoting Reg:
Steve
Could you please explain why Merck & Co who are the largest Ivermectin producers have made the following statement on the use of Ivermectin during the Covid pandemic?

https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/
In the last decade or so, Merck & Co. has paid out over $4.85 billion in judgements and settlements for lawsuits. Should I accept a statement from a company with a long history of lying and cheating or 52 trials performed by 426 scientists confirming the efficay of Ivermecting in treating this disease?

To answer your question, is it because Ivermectin is too cheap and is available as a generic prescription drug?

Quoting Norman L:

The ivermectin thing looks interesting. Thank you for that.
The Ivermecting "thing" that looks interesting to you was linked via swprs.org. I guess not everything in that site is nonsense.



Stopped clocks are right twice a day.
+1 #14 Reg 2021-04-19 14:33
Steve
So you happily endorse swprs.org which recommends using Ivermectin (a deworming tablet) as a Covid prophylaxis? A drug that is not authorised by the EMA (see my post #6)!!

I wonder if you have agreed to have the vaccine which is approved by the European Medicines Agency.
-2 #13 Steve 2021-04-19 10:17
Quoting Reg:
Steve
Could you please explain why Merck & Co who are the largest Ivermectin producers have made the following statement on the use of Ivermectin during the Covid pandemic?

https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/
In the last decade or so, Merck & Co. has paid out over $4.85 billion in judgements and settlements for lawsuits. Should I accept a statement from a company with a long history of lying and cheating or 52 trials performed by 426 scientists confirming the efficay of Ivermecting in treating this disease?

To answer your question, is it because Ivermectin is too cheap and is available as a generic prescription drug?

Quoting Norman L:

The ivermectin thing looks interesting. Thank you for that.
The Ivermecting "thing" that looks interesting to you was linked via swprs.org. I guess not everything in that site is nonsense.
+2 #12 Norman L 2021-04-19 09:11
Quoting Reg:
Steve
Could you please explain why Merck & Co who are the largest Ivermectin producers have made the following statement on the use of Ivermectin during the Covid pandemic?

https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/



Yes, but what do they know about anything? Obviously trashing their own product because ..(insert favourite theory here).

You must be a registered user to make comments.
Please register here to post your comments.