The European Parliament have approved the adoption of the Covid-19 digital certificate, which will allow EU citizens already vaccinated, recovered from an infection or tested, to travel without restrictions within the European Union from 1st July.
In a vote held on Tuesday in Strasbourg, but the result of which was only released this morning due to the remote counting of votes, the assembly gave its 'green light' to the digital certification, with 546 votes in favour, 93 against and 51 abstentions.
After, in mid-May, the negotiators of the Portuguese presidency of the EU Council and the European Parliament reached a political agreement on the certificate, proposed by the European Commission last March, the approval by the assembly paves the way for its entry into force, as planned, on July 1st, for a duration of 12 months.
Designed to facilitate a return to free movement within the EU and to support the tourism sector in particular, in an attempt to 'save' the summer of 2021, this 'transit pass', will work similarly to a travel card. boarding for trips, in digital and/or paper format, with a QR code to be easily read by electronic devices, and which is made available free of charge, in the citizen's national language and in English.
As part of the implementation of this European certificate, it is expected that Member States will not apply restrictions again, when almost half of Europeans have already received the first dose of the vaccine against Covid-19, unless the epidemiological situation justifies it. However, it will always be up to national governments to decide whether travellers with the certificate will have to undergo quarantine, further testing (for example, in addition to entry tests) or additional requirements.
On Tuesday, the European Commission urged EU member states to start issuing certificates proving vaccination, recovery or testing to Covid-19, in order to avoid “major blockages” in the official launch of the digital document at the community level.
Original article available in Portuguese at http://postal.pt/
Comments
When I was vaccinated in the UK (I can't comment on Portugal) I was given a sheet of paper which outlined possible side effects. It also gave a link to the coronavirus-yellow card website where you can report any adverse reactions. I only had some pain in my upper arm (less painful than my shingles vaccination) so I did not report it. My other half had a temperature, was shivering and had muscular pain lasting 24hrs which was reported. Second jab no symptoms.
So 1 person with 3 different symptoms will be recorded in 3 categories.Most of the recorded symptoms fall into "General disorder and administration site disorder" category.
To get a clearer understanding of the EU database download https://www.adrreports.eu/en/ and read the key information.
https://dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FPHV%20DAP%2F_portal%2FDAP&Action=Navigate&P0=1&P1=eq&P2=%22Line%20Listing%20Objects%22.%22Substance%20High%20Level%20Code%22&P3=1+42325700
Choose the "Number of Individual Cases for a Selected Reaction" tab.
It is tiring having to work my way through your garbled posts. You say that the great Doctor is overseeing the treatment of Covid patients. There are no reports (well I can't find them) that indicate how many he has treated, the side effects and the outcome of his recommended treatment. His algorithm based study and recommendations have been refuted by various organisations.
But least (unlike you) McCullough acknowledges that these early recommended treatments do not replace vaccines (your link c19early.com) and his guide says Covid, unlike the usual seasonal influenza, can become profoundly serious in unpredictable ways (p8).
No idea why you mention Facebook! I don't follow social media. You want me to check out 257 HCQ trials and 60 Ivermectin trial. You are having a laugh?!
If you post spurious figures at least have the courtesy and add the source.
Just imagine, fact-checkers checking facts. What is the world coming to when you can't just post any old nonsense any more?
That explains it!
This is the level of fact checking you get from a fact checker partnered with Facebook
"Misleading: The number of medical issues (adverse events) recorded after vaccination does not indicate that the vaccine caused them or that the vaccine is unsafe. The Yellow Card scheme allows regulators to identify unexpected rare side effects following an investigation. The British health regulator has done this for side effects identified in this way and concluded that the benefits of the COVID-19 vaccines outweigh their known risks."
First of all there hasn't been any investigation on the reported side effects. Second the benefits of this vaccine on a healthy person that is extremely unlikely to die of this virus does not outweigh the risks posed by an untested vaccine.
Again you have mentioned one halted HCQ trial, do you know why that trial didn't work? There are 257 HCQ trials and 60 Ivermectin trials that you keep ignoring. Why don't you go fact check those trials and while you're at it fact check the papers published by Dr Peter A. McCullough for Covid early treatment.
My reply and clarification to your post #49:
I have NOT ignored your reference to Dr P McCullough. Please read my post #47 again. My advice to your link in your post #45 was to read the Introduction of "A guide to home-based Covid treatment" an online publication - the Consulting Editor is Dr McCullough. Other claims by the cardiology have also been reviewed by The Healthfeedback.org - I suggest you read that as well.
Sorry to confuse you by putting a line break between the 2nd and 3rd paragraph. I am saying I find it strange that you agree the data published by the EMA but you do not agree with EMA's advice concerning Ivermectin.
Sorry for leaving out the Decimal Point from your quoted figures (post #25) but even "1.48 million injured from these 4 injections in Clinical TRIALS in the EU" is a claim I can not concur.
You say you prefer to trust the expertise of Peter McCullough. So I am asking you again have you been swallowing this elixir for the past year?
.....In previous Clinical Trials, if 25 to 50 people died in the Clinical Trial, the trial would be stopped. There are 13, 867 deaths and 1.48 million injured from these 4 injections in Clinical Trials in the European Union up until 5th June 2021.
#50 Steve"]Quoting Norman L:Norman go back and read the posts again. EudraVigilance the european database. You can look up MHRA Yellow card for UK injury reports, up to 1332 fatalaties for the 3 vaccines. In the US you can look up VAERS, latest data shows 5165 deaths. Lets hope you're not ignorant of these facts. And before you misquote me again none of these fatalities have been confirmed to be directly linked to the vaccines but they're too many to ignore and deserve investigating.
interesting. You say in your #50 '...before you (Norman) misquote me again none of these fatalities have been confirmed to be directly linked...' but that is exactly what you are alleging in your #25.'There are 13.867 killed etc'.
And I've read the MHRA report. Nothing alarming or unexpected there for millions of jabs.
BTW, all vaccinated people die after the vaccine, not before it.