Albufeira Mayor released from hospital following “excellent recovery”

Albufeira Mayor José Carlos RoloAlbufeira Mayor José Carlos Rolo was released from hospital yesterday (September 9) following an “excellent recovery” from a pulmonary infection.

The mayor will now begin a “resting period near his family,” Albufeira Council said today in a statement to the press.

“We appreciate the concern demonstrated by the people of Albufeira concerning his health and wish that he can be near all of us again soon,” it said.

José Carlos Rolo, who will be running for reelection in the upcoming local elections, was admitted to hospital on August 25.

Article written by Michael Bruxo, photo by João Chambino, by kind permission of The Algarve Resident

Pin It

Comments  

-1 #18 Norman L 2021-09-16 10:50
Quoting Trevor Morgan:
Quoting Norman L:
I find it amazing that people think there's something wrong with fact checkers being paid to expose the crap that conspiracy theorists try to pass off as fact. Are they supposed to do it for free?

The argument isn't that they are paid or not, of course they need to be paid. The issue is who pays them. They are not impartial therefore cannot be relied upon to be truthful. If they were to speak out against the narrative they'd be out of a job.



Who in your book can be relied upon to be impartial, then? Anyone checking and coming up with something you don't like can be described as not following the narrative, an easy get out, especially since a lot of the stuff claimed to be factual is just copying someone on the internet.

Steve says something about smear articles. What does he think about David's 'closet satanists, paedophiles and the C300'? Looks pretty much like slinging a bit of mud and hoping some of it sticks. Drawing attention to, say, V Coleman's view on the non-existence of AIDS isn't smearing, it's showing how little his opinions have to do with reality.
-4 #17 Steve 2021-09-16 10:07
Quoting Trevor Morgan:

The argument isn't that they are paid or not, of course they need to be paid. The issue is who pays them. They are not impartial therefore cannot be relied upon to be truthful. If they were to speak out against the narrative they'd be out of a job.
Thank you Trevor I was beginning to think that ADN readers cannot understand the that opinions, "facts", and scientific research can be bought for profit making.
Quoting Reg:
Also Steve can your doctor name the relevant ingredients of ivermectin and/or hydroxychloroquine which supposedly treats covid?

Reg Ivermectin (derived from Avermectin) is a molecule found in nature originating from a single microorganism. No ingredients. You know where hydroxychloroquine comes from, also a molecule. Besides the composition is written on the box, no need to ask your doctor.
Both drugs are on the WHO list of essential medecines. One of them was awarded a Nobel prize.
+3 #16 Trevor Morgan 2021-09-15 21:30
Quoting Norman L:
I find it amazing that people think there's something wrong with fact checkers being paid to expose the crap that conspiracy theorists try to pass off as fact. Are they supposed to do it for free?

The argument isn't that they are paid or not, of course they need to be paid. The issue is who pays them. They are not impartial therefore cannot be relied upon to be truthful. If they were to speak out against the narrative they'd be out of a job.
-3 #15 Reg 2021-09-15 12:27
Quoting Steve:
Quoting Reg:
David
I wonder how many ADN readers believe the rubbish that comes out of Mike Yeadon's mouth.
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/health-coronavirus-vaccines-skeptic/
Says the person who relies on paid for fact checkers and smear articles for the truth.

So it is OK spouting misinformation to earn money from youtube videos and publications but investigated these false claims should be done for free.
Also Steve can your doctor name the relevant ingredients of ivermectin and/or hydroxychloroquine which supposedly treats covid?
+1 #14 Norman L 2021-09-14 19:12
I find it amazing that people think there's something wrong with fact checkers being paid to expose the crap that conspiracy theorists try to pass off as fact. Are they supposed to do it for free?
-4 #13 Steve 2021-09-14 17:28
Quoting Chip:
David
Headon is the idiot who said that Covid was over last October and whose research facility at Pfizer was shut down and he was kicked out.
Think I'll stick with the advice of my doctor, hospitals and the vast majority of world experts rather than your cabal of fruitcakes.
Can your doctor name all the ingredients in your miracle jab? Chip no need to lie about Mike Yeadon's career to make a point the truth is more convincing.
-3 #12 Steve 2021-09-14 17:26
Quoting Reg:
David
I wonder how many ADN readers believe the rubbish that comes out of Mike Yeadon's mouth.
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/health-coronavirus-vaccines-skeptic/
Says the person who relies on paid for fact checkers and smear articles for the truth.
-2 #11 Chip 2021-09-14 13:13
David
Headon is the idiot who said that Covid was over last October and whose research facility at Pfizer was shut down and he was kicked out.
Think I'll stick with the advice of my doctor, hospitals and the vast majority of world experts rather than your cabal of fruitcakes.
-3 #10 Reg 2021-09-14 12:00
David
I wonder how many ADN readers believe the rubbish that comes out of Mike Yeadon's mouth.
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/health-coronavirus-vaccines-skeptic/
-2 #9 David 2021-09-13 23:48
Many people had prior or cross-immunity to SARS-CoV-2, because of exposure in the past to related viruses. This happens even if the degree of commonality isn’t huge, because certain components of each type of virus tend to be conserved across the range of them. This is the 7th known coronavirus which can infect humans.

Those with prior immunity experienced predictably adverse events upon vaccination. Normal immunity protects you against serious illness when encountering the same virus. But these vaccines work so differently that they distribute parts of the virus around the body to locations not normally accomplished by natural infection.

This set up immune attack on the inside of our blood vessels, initiating blood clots & bleeding. Killer T-cells, immune complement & antibody mediated attack on our own tissues is all but inevitable.
The worst of it is that BOOSTER injections have not been subject to ANY clinical safety trials.
I cannot believe that medicines regulators & senior physicians as well as clinical & academic immunologists haven’t been warning loudly that this is an unsafe & potentially catastrophic course of action.

Not mentioned in this letter, I have separately seen strong evidence of a dose-effect relationship, where all manner of adverse events are 5-10x more common after the second dose than the first dose.

I strongly recommend that NO ONE exposes themselves to the risk of augmented autoimmune attack on their body by receiving a booster.

Dr Mike Yeadon

You must be a registered user to make comments.
Please register here to post your comments.