fbpx
Log in

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *
Captcha *

Lone Star's massive write-offs at Novo Banco trigger more taxpayer loans

novobancoshinylogoNovo Banco’s losses could reach €1 billion in 2017 with the Resolution Fund on alert to inject more capital which it is unlikely to have.
 
The bank, 75% owned and controlled by American vulture fund, Lone Star, embarked on an aggressive policy of 'recognising losses' on toxic assets which, under the terms of the sale agreement, are the responsibility of the Resolution Fund supported by injections of cash from Portugal’s high street banks and topped up by loans from Portugal's taxpayers.
 
The accelerated write-offs reflect a requirement from the European authorities which want to clear bad debts quickly - this suits Lone Star which wants to return the former BES to profit in preparation for a probable sale in not less than three years time.
 
The government, aka Portugal's taxpayers, may well have to top up the Resolution Fund with a further loan if this institution's funds are not sufficient to cover the write-offs at Novo Banco.
 
Expresso’s Saturday edition concludes that taxpayers will have to inject up to €850 million to support the Resolution Fund under the terms of the sale agreement to cover the bank’s impairments.
 
Novo Banco’s record losses for 2017, of several hundred million euros, maybe as much as a billion, will necessitate a taxpayer loan two years earlier than expected.
 
The sale to the vulture fund contained clauses that left the Resolution Fund and taxpayers in the unenviable position of having to support futher losses as bad debts are written off by a management over which the State has no control. 
Pin It

Comments  

-1 #11 Two.Sugars.in.my.tea 2018-02-25 09:53
Ah, yes our US allies. Well as they own the bank now, maybe a good marketing opportunity is to offer loans to sell personal assault rifles - but only from the NRA website... :cry: :cry: :cry:
0 #10 Denby 2018-02-20 11:49
Elsa,
You mentioned defined terms and anchored to some security. My Nephew and his wife in the UK have been offered a 5 year fixed term mortgage to purchase an apartment, (they already have a very large mortgage on their home. They have no security except their two job's, to me this is reckless banking. What would happen if one of them become unemployed or has to take a reduction on their wages and unable to meet the repayments.
+1 #9 Poor Portugesa 2018-02-19 10:36
Quoting Peter Booker:
The state could have done all this without the need to involve an American vulture fund. It looks like Portugal´s taxpayer being forced to subsidise American Wall Street millionaires.

EXACTLY! Will our judicial system ever be up to prosecuting, assets-freezing and jailing any (or all) of these 'politico-banksters'? Mmmm
-1 #8 Darcy 2018-02-18 22:24
Elsa, the UK is looking down the barrel of a gun where Brexit is concerned, You think Portugal's problems are bad, wait to you see what is coming down the road for the UK post 2020.
+2 #7 nogin the nog 2018-02-18 21:20
hmm
Who says Organized Crime doesn't exist...
:-*
+1 #6 Denby 2018-02-18 17:29
Darran,
Every country has the equivalent of golden visa's, even dear old Blighty (England).
Don't be naive to think that The UK would not be involved in such corrupt activity, the Uk has even biger tricks lined up than just golden visa's.
The recent on is the crinion scandal and many more.
+4 #5 Elsa 2018-02-18 17:28
Our Ed: is perhaps stretching the terminology in referring to 'Taxpayers Loans' to Novo Banco / BES. A Loan as understood in the English language to come with defined terms and conditions requiring paying back anchored on some security. Otherwise it is some kind of gift or grant - as we have seen with the unsecured, unrecoverable bank gifts to favoured clients using unfavoured clients money - intentionally banked for its safety with 'professionals' rather than kept under the mattress.
All the native Portuguese Banks failed with serious costs to mainly the Portuguese tax payer and more rarely the shareholders and investors. Is it not time to track down all Portuguese nationals who did well out of their native Bank collapses and get what they took out - back ?
+3 #4 Darren 2018-02-18 11:11
There are a lot of short memories when discussing the native Portuguese Banks - which have all failed due to fraud and / or mismanagement. But the tragedy is that all this would have been avoided if Portugal was / is the more developed society it has spent 30 years claiming to be. Wherein Bank employee whistle blowers have a direct line to anonymously warn genuinely independent Bank Regulators of suspicious activity. That is then effectively followed up.
This is still non-existent in Portugal - the only dodgy dealing revealed lately had all been triggered by foreign banks alerting the Portuguese Bank that they had logged the event at their end. So forcing the Portuguese Bank to at least note it. But still no follow up ever, particularly if it is Golden Visa's!
+4 #3 Ed 2018-02-18 09:52
Quoting Atlasfrog:
Wouldn't it be nice for the tax payer to understand exactly who benefited from this disaster.
Lone Star which was handed 75% of the business for zero euros, which has the Resolution Fund and taxpayers underwriting its future write-offs and losses and which can sell out in three years - presumably to the Chinese company which offered €3 billion but, strangely, was rejected by the Bank of Portugal whose disaster this is.

Taxpayers will never see a return on the €3 billion that the Bank of Portugal's Carlos Costa pumped into the bankrupt BES to create Novo Banco.
+5 #2 Atlasfrog 2018-02-18 09:32
Wouldn't it be nice for the tax payer to understand exactly who benefited from this disaster.

You must be a registered user to make comments.
Please register here to post your comments.