More than 5,600 people have already signed a public petition calling for intervention from the Government to prevent the installation of a museum dedicated to the former dictatorship of the Estado Novo and its leader, Salazar, in Santa Comba Dão, Viseu.
The digital document was posted on the Internet two and a half days ago and has already been signed by some well-known Portuguese figures, such as former union leader Carvalho da Silva, political analyst Pedro Adão e Silva, writer Maria Teresa Horta, former University of Lisbon dean José Barata Moura and singer Francisco Fanhais, among others.
The petition, titled “No Salazar Museum!" supports an open letter to the Prime Minister, António Costa, from August 12th, in which 204 former political prisoners demanded action from the PS executive, as well as expressing "the most vehement rejection" for the initiative announced by the local mayor.
According to the petition, the Santa Comba Dão project is "far from being aimed at enlightening the population and especially the younger generations", and would be "an instrument at the service of the whitewashing of the fascist regime, and a toxic centre for nostalgia of the regime overthrown on the 25th of April 1974".
Comments
There are people here in Portugal who see nostalgically through rose-tinted glasses that the Estado Novo was a time of stability and certainty. Similarly, there are people in Russia who look back on the Soviet regime for similar reasons. They were not affected by the downsides, and perhaps benefitted from the advantages of these regimes.
EXPLAIN YOURSELF !!!
Do you know what it is like to live in a country that is ruled by a dictator.... if you did, you wouldn't make such an idiotic comment.
Costa-ship is still a dictatorship under the guise of another name. Democracy would require a democratic judicial, political and policing system. Progress here is slower than the queue at Financas.
I am fascinated by AL´s view of history. How do you go about not offending people who are for whatever reason biassed; and yet remain truthful?
And the winner always writes the history. For example, who won the Battle of Waterloo? The British have always thought that they did, under their General the Duke of Wellington. It was really a German victory - they supplied the most troops, and without Blücher, the battle would have been lost. At the very least, it was an Allied victory.
................................................
This is a very sweeping statement, could you please explain which system is rotten and who is totally corrupt ! !
You cannot erase or hide the past to satisfy "fragile minds". History is about educating the younger generations and not offending the older ones.
Let visitors to the museum form their own opinions and stop trying to manipulate history.